Labor Unions Under Neoliberalism: Part I
State Labor Union Density 2000 - 2024
Accessing the Data
I produced the below visualization using the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ (2015)
Data Retrieval: Labor Force Statistics (CPS) page. After selecting “Table 5. Union affiliation of
employed wage and salary workers by state,” hover over the “Members of Unions” column
and click the “Select All” option under the sub-column “Percent of employed”. Before
pressing the “Retrieve Data” button at the bottom of the web page, remove the tick marks
from “Select All,” “United States,” and “District of Columbia.” Now that you have retrieved
the data, change the output date from 2014-2024 to 2000-2024. You will see that the
visualization’s numbers matches the table data from BLS as the years progress.
Discussion
Labor union density is another way of saying union membership as a percentage of the
labor force. The time-series map tracks union density from 2000-2024 across all 50 states.
Dark red gradients signal lower densities while brighter yellow gradients mean higher
densities. As the timeline moves forward, the US union density shrinks compared to what it
was at the start of the millennium. The nation’s union strongholds are in the Pacific,
Great Lakes, and the Mid-Atlantic states. In comparison, the Midwest and South have
union densities below 10%.
The Great Lakes region tallied the most union losses with declines of 5% or more in the
period. Wisconsin, Michigan, and Iowa experienced the largest downturns, ranging from
7%-11%. On a positive note, New York and Hawaii were the only states able to keep their
union densities above 20%. Since every region had one or more states face a decline,
unions face political and economic hurdles beyond traditional right-to-work laws.
Sherer and Gould (2024) from the Economic Policy Institute have a primer and visualizations
of their own on state right-to-work laws.
Map Visualization
Works Cited
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2015, September 16). Table 5. Union affiliation of employed wage and salary workers by state. https://www.bls.gov/webapps/legacy/cpslutab5.htm
Sherer, J., & Gould, E. (2024, February 13). Data show anti-union ‘right-to-work’ laws damage state economies: As Michigan’s repeal takes effect, New Hampshire should continue to reject ‘right-to-work’ legislation. Economic Policy Institute. https://www.epi.org/blog/data-show-anti-union-right-to-work-laws-damage-state-economies-as-michigans-repeal-takes-effect-new-hampshire-should-continue-to-reject-right-to-work-legislation/